I think the answer is "yes, sometimes".
One area where I've had success recently is with summarising trial results. When evaluating the results of a trial the executive summary needs to convey the key outcomes that were measured and tell stakeholders what action needs to be taken as a result. With smaller trials it can also be very important to explain how confident we are in the results. Doing this visually can help to explain confidence intervals to non-technical audiences.
My executive summary looked something like this (obviously all the numbers here are made up):
By expressing all of the metrics as percentage impacts, it's possible to plot them on a single chart. For the key metric, metric 1, the short comment to the right gives a value to this impact. The rest of the presentation gives more specifics on the other metrics.
There were a few key design decisions made in producing the visual:
- The order of the metrics - metric 1 is the key metric and hence is positioned at the top. Metric 2 is explained by metric 3, so it makes sense for them to be together.
- Each item of commentary is aligned against the bar which it comments on.
- The mid point markers (labelled as "measured impact") are large enough to stand out, without being so large that they make it hard to identify the value they are showing.
- The confidence interval bars are a lot narrower than I would normally use for a bar chart. This is to focus attention on the mid point markers. I found that wider bars meant the mid point markers got lost.
With a view similar to this, I found that I was able to talk through the entire project from one slide. It's got me wondering what other situations lend themselves to a charted executive summary?
No comments:
Post a Comment