In fact it was worse than this, I've tried to make the best of a bad chart by adding in some better practice around titles and labelling.
I think that there are four main things wrong with this chart:
- The linear distances for the pie chart are much shorter than those for the donut. For instance Segment B has a lower value in 2015 but a longer line when compared to 2014.
- Only the first and last segments can be compared directly between years as they have a commonly aligned point - the start of Segment A or the end of Segment E.
- There's no easy way to denote what the inner and outer sections represent. I've added this to the title as the best way that I could think to do it.
- As with all pie charts, the segments have to be coloured differently, preventing the use of colour to draw attention to key points.
I set about looking at alternatives to this chart, only to discover that Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic has been there before me looking at a similar problem on her excellent blog. Rather than create a poor reproduction of her thinking, I'd suggest having a read there.
Suffice it to say here that I decided upon a slope chart as the best way to convey the particular point that I chose to make with the data. With a slope chart every segment is easily comparable across the two years and it's possible to be sparing with colour to highlight a key point.
Incidentally, I did come across a doughnut pie that I feel I could get behind.
No comments:
Post a Comment